Lab 10 Solutions

Solution Files

Topics

Consult this section if you need a refresher on the material for this lab. It's okay to skip directly to the questions and refer back here should you get stuck.

Scheme

Scheme is a famous functional programming language from the 1970s. It is a dialect of Lisp (which stands for LISt Processing). The first observation most people make is the unique syntax, which uses a prefix notation and (often many) nested parentheses (see http://xkcd.com/297/). Scheme features first-class functions and optimized tail-recursion, which were relatively new features at the time.

Our course uses a custom version of Scheme (which you will build for Project 4) included in the starter ZIP archive. To start the interpreter, type python3 scheme. To run a Scheme program interactively, type python3 scheme -i <file.scm>. To exit the Scheme interpreter, type (exit).

You may find it useful to try scheme.cs61a.org when working through problems, as it can draw environment and box-and-pointer diagrams and it lets you walk your code step-by-step (similar to Python Tutor). Don't forget to submit your code through Ok though!

Expressions

Atomic Expressions

Just like in Python, atomic, or primitive, expressions in Scheme take a single step to evaluate. These include numbers, booleans, symbols.

scm> 1234    ; integer
1234
scm> 123.4   ; real number
123.4

Symbols

Out of these, the symbol type is the only one we didn't encounter in Python. A symbol acts a lot like a Python name, but not exactly. Specifically, a symbol in Scheme is also a type of value. On the other hand, in Python, names only serve as expressions; a Python expression can never evaluate to a name.

scm> quotient      ; A name bound to a built-in procedure
#[quotient]
scm> 'quotient     ; An expression that evaluates to a symbol
quotient
scm> 'hello-world!
hello-world!

Booleans

In Scheme, all values except the special boolean value #f are interpreted as true values (unlike Python, where there are some false-y values like 0). Our particular version of the Scheme interpreter allows you to write True and False in place of #t and #f. This is not standard.

scm> #t
#t
scm> #f
#f

Call expressions

Like Python, the operator in a Scheme call expression comes before all the operands. Unlike Python, the operator is included within the parentheses and the operands are separated by spaces rather than with commas. However, evaluation of a Scheme call expression follows the exact same rules as in Python:

  1. Evaluate the operator. It should evaluate to a procedure.
  2. Evaluate the operands, left to right.
  3. Apply the procedure to the evaluated operands.

Here are some examples using built-in procedures:

scm> (+ 1 2)
3
scm> (- 10 (/ 6 2))
7
scm> (modulo 35 4)
3
scm> (even? (quotient 45 2))
#t

Special forms

The operator of a special form expression is a special form. What makes a special form "special" is that they do not follow the three rules of evaluation stated in the previous section. Instead, each special form follows its own special rules for execution, such as short-circuiting before evaluating all the operands.

Some examples of special forms that we'll study today are the if, cond, define, and lambda forms. Read their corresponding sections below to find out what their rules of evaluation are!

Control Structures

if Expressions

The if special form allows us to evaluate one of two expressions based on a predicate. It takes in two required arguments and an optional third argument:

(if <predicate> <if-true> [if-false])

The first operand is what's known as a predicate expression in Scheme, an expression whose value is interpreted as either #t or #f.

The rules for evaluating an if special form expression are as follows:

  1. Evaluate <predicate>.
  2. If <predicate> evaluates to a truth-y value, evaluate and return the value if the expression <if-true>. Otherwise, evaluate and return the value of [if-false] if it is provided.

Can you see why this expression is a special form? Compare the rules between a regular call expression and an if expression. What is the difference?

Step 2 of evaluating call expressions requires evaluating all of the operands in order. However, an if expression will only evaluate two of its operands, the conditional expression and either <true-result> or <false-result>. Because we don't evaluate all the operands in an if expression, it is a special form.

Let's compare a Scheme if expression with a Python if statement:

Scheme Python
scm> (if (> x 3)
         1
         2)
>>> if x > 3:
...     1
... else:
...     2

Although the code may look the same, what happens when each block of code is evaluated is actually very different. Specifically, the Scheme expression, given that it is an expression, evaluates to some value. However, the Python if statement simply directs the flow of the program.

Another difference between the two is that it's possible to add more lines of code into the suites of the Python if statement, while a Scheme if expression expects just a single expression for each of the true result and the false result.

One final difference is that in Scheme, you cannot write elif cases. If you want to have multiple cases using the if expression, you would need multiple branched if expressions:

Scheme Python
scm> (if (< x 0)
         'negative
         (if (= x 0)
             'zero
             'positive
         )
 )
>>> if x < 0:
...     'negative'
... else:
...     if x == 0:
...         'zero'
...     else:
...         'positive'

cond Expressions

Using nested if expressions doesn't seem like a very practical way to take care of multiple cases. Instead, we can use the cond special form, a general conditional expression similar to a multi-clause if/elif/else conditional expression in Python. cond takes in an arbitrary number of arguments known as clauses. A clause is written as a list containing two expressions: (<p> <e>).

(cond
    (<p1> <e1>)
    (<p2> <e2>)
    ...
    (<pn> <en>)
    [(else <else-expression>)])

The first expression in each clause is a predicate. The second expression in the clause is the return expression corresponding to its predicate. The optional else clause has no predicate.

The rules of evaluation are as follows:

  1. Evaluate the predicates <p1>, <p2>, ..., <pn> in order until you reach one that evaluates to a truth-y value.
  2. If you reach a predicate that evaluates to a truth-y value, evaluate and return the corresponding expression in the clause.
  3. If none of the predicates are truth-y and there is an else clause, evaluate and return <else-expression>.

As you can see, cond is a special form because it does not evaluate its operands in their entirety; the predicates are evaluated separately from their corresponding return expression. In addition, the expression short circuits upon reaching the first predicate that evaluates to a truth-y value, leaving the remaining predicates unevaluated.

The following code is roughly equivalent (see the explanation in the if expression section):

Scheme Python
scm> (cond
        ((> x 0) 'positive)
        ((< x 0) 'negative)
        (else 'zero))
>>> if x > 0:
...     'positive'
... elif x < 0:
...     'negative'
... else:
...     'zero'

Lists

As you read through this section, it may be difficult to understand the differences between the various representations of Scheme containers. We recommend that you use our online Scheme interpreter to see the box-and-pointer diagrams of pairs and lists that you're having a hard time visualizing! (Use the command (autodraw) to toggle the automatic drawing of diagrams.)

Lists

Scheme lists are very similar to the linked lists we've been working with in Python. Just like how a linked list is constructed of a series of Link objects, a Scheme list is constructed with a series of pairs, which are created with the constructor cons.

Scheme lists require that the cdr is either another list or nil, an empty list. A list is displayed in the interpreter as a sequence of values (similar to the __str__ representation of a Link object). For example,

scm> (cons 1 (cons 2 (cons 3 nil)))
(1 2 3)

Here, we've ensured that the second argument of each cons expression is another cons expression or nil.

list

We can retrieve values from our list with the car and cdr procedures, which now work similarly to the Python Link's first and rest attributes. (Curious about where these weird names come from? Check out their etymology.)

scm> (define a (cons 1 (cons 2 (cons 3 nil))))  ; Assign the list to the name a
a
scm> a
(1 2 3)
scm> (car a)
1
scm> (cdr a)
(2 3)
scm> (car (cdr (cdr a)))
3

If you do not pass in a pair or nil as the second argument to cons, it will error:

scm> (cons 1 2)
Error

list Procedure

There are a few other ways to create lists. The list procedure takes in an arbitrary number of arguments and constructs a list with the values of these arguments:

scm> (list 1 2 3)
(1 2 3)
scm> (list 1 (list 2 3) 4)
(1 (2 3) 4)
scm> (list (cons 1 (cons 2 nil)) 3 4)
((1 2) 3 4)

Note that all of the operands in this expression are evaluated before being put into the resulting list.

Quote Form

We can also use the quote form to create a list, which will construct the exact list that is given. Unlike with the list procedure, the argument to ' is not evaluated.

scm> '(1 2 3)
(1 2 3)
scm> '(cons 1 2)           ; Argument to quote is not evaluated
(cons 1 2)
scm> '(1 (2 3 4))
(1 (2 3 4))

Built-In Procedures for Lists

There are a few other built-in procedures in Scheme that are used for lists. Try them out in the interpreter!

scm> (null? nil)                ; Checks if a value is the empty list
True
scm> (append '(1 2 3) '(4 5 6)) ; Concatenates two lists
(1 2 3 4 5 6)
scm> (length '(1 2 3 4 5))      ; Returns the number of elements in a list
5

Defining procedures

The special form define is used to define variables and functions in Scheme. There are two versions of the define special form. To define variables, we use the define form with the following syntax:
(define <name> <expression>)

The rules to evaluate this expression are

  1. Evaluate the <expression>.
  2. Bind its value to the <name> in the current frame.
  3. Return <name>.

The second version of define is used to define procedures:

(define (<name> <param1> <param2> ...) <body> )

To evaluate this expression:

  1. Create a lambda procedure with the given parameters and <body>.
  2. Bind the procedure to the <name> in the current frame.
  3. Return <name>.

The following two expressions are equivalent:

scm> (define foo (lambda (x y) (+ x y)))
foo
scm> (define (foo x y) (+ x y))
foo

define is a special form because its operands are not evaluated at all! For example, <body> is not evaluated when a procedure is defined, but rather when it is called. <name> and the parameter names are all names that should not be evaluated when executing this define expression.

Lambdas

All Scheme procedures are lambda procedures. To create a lambda procedure, we can use the lambda special form:
(lambda (<param1> <param2> ...) <body>)

This expression will create and return a function with the given parameters and body, but it will not alter the current environment. This is very similar to a lambda expression in Python!

scm> (lambda (x y) (+ x y))        ; Returns a lambda function, but doesn't assign it to a name
(lambda (x y) (+ x y))
scm> ((lambda (x y) (+ x y)) 3 4)  ; Create and call a lambda function in one line
7

A procedure may take in any number of parameters. The <body> may contain multiple expressions. There is not an equivalent version of a Python return statement in Scheme. The function will simply return the value of the last expression in the body.

Required Questions

What Would Scheme Display?

Q1: WWSD: Lists

Use Ok to test your knowledge with the following "What Would Scheme Display?" questions:

python3 ok -q wwsd_lists -u
scm> (cons 1 (cons 2 nil))
______
(1 2)
scm> (car (cons 1 (cons 2 nil)))
______
1
scm> (cdr (cons 1 (cons 2 nil)))
______
(2)
scm> (list 1 2 3)
______
(1 2 3)
scm> '(1 2 3)
______
(1 2 3)
scm> (cons 1 '(list 2 3)) ; Recall quoting
______
(1 list 2 3)
scm> (cons 1 `(list 2 3)) ; Quasiquotes also work as quotes!
______
(1 list 2 3)
scm> '(cons 4 (cons (cons 6 8) ()))
______
(cons 4 (cons (cons 6 8) ()))
scm> (cons 1 (list (cons 3 nil) 4 5))
______
(1 (3) 4 5)

Coding Questions

Q2: Over or Under

Define a procedure over-or-under which takes in a number num1 and a number num2 and returns the following:

  • -1 if num1 is less than num2
  • 0 if num1 is equal to num2
  • 1 if num1 is greater than num2
(define (over-or-under num1 num2)
(cond ((< num1 num2) -1) ((= num1 num2) 0) (else 1))
) ;;; Tests (over-or-under 1 2) ; expect -1 (over-or-under 2 1) ; expect 1 (over-or-under 1 1) ; expect 0

Video walkthrough:

Use Ok to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q over_or_under -u
python3 ok -q over_or_under

Q3: Filter Lst

Write a procedure filter-lst, which takes a predicate fn and a list lst, and returns a new list containing only elements of the list that satisfy the predicate. The output should contain the elements in the same order that they appeared in the original list.

(define (filter-lst fn lst)
(cond ((null? lst) '()) ((fn (car lst)) (cons (car lst) (filter-lst fn (cdr lst)))) (else (filter-lst fn (cdr lst))))
) ;;; Tests (define (even? x) (= (modulo x 2) 0)) (filter-lst even? '(0 1 1 2 3 5 8)) ; expect (0 2 8)
Video walkthrough:

Use Ok to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q filter_lst -u
python3 ok -q filter_lst

Q4: Make Adder

Write the procedure make-adder which takes in an initial number, num, and then returns a procedure. This returned procedure takes in a number inc and returns the result of num + inc.

Hint: To return a procedure, you can either return a lambda expression or define another nested procedure. Remember that Scheme will automatically return the last clause in your procedure.

(define (make-adder num)
(lambda (inc) (+ inc num))
) ;;; Tests (define adder (make-adder 5)) (adder 8) ; expect 13

Use Ok to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q make_adder -u
python3 ok -q make_adder

Submit

Make sure to submit this assignment by running:

python3 ok --submit

Optional Questions

The following questions are for extra practice. However, they are in scope and we recommend you do them if you have time.

Q5: Make a List

Create the list with the following box-and-pointer diagram:

linked list

(define lst
(cons (cons 1 nil) (cons 2 (cons (cons 3 (cons 4 nil)) (cons 5 nil))))
)

Use Ok to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q make_structure -u
python3 ok -q make_structure

Q6: Compose

Write the procedure composed, which takes in procedures f and g and outputs a new procedure. This new procedure takes in a number x and outputs the result of calling f on g of x.

(define (composed f g)
(lambda (x) (f (g x)))
)

Use Ok to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q composed -u
python3 ok -q composed

Q7: Remove

Implement a procedure remove that takes in a list and returns a new list with all instances of item removed from lst. You may assume the list will only consist of numbers and will not have nested lists.

Hint: You might find the filter-lst procedure useful.

(define (remove item lst)
(cond ((null? lst) '()) ((equal? item (car lst)) (remove item (cdr lst))) (else (cons (car lst) (remove item (cdr lst)))))
)
(define (remove item lst) (filter (lambda (x) (not (= x item))) lst))
;;; Tests (remove 3 nil) ; expect () (remove 3 '(1 3 5)) ; expect (1 5) (remove 5 '(5 3 5 5 1 4 5 4)) ; expect (3 1 4 4)

Use Ok to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q remove -u
python3 ok -q remove

Q8: No Repeats

Implement no-repeats, which takes a list of numbers s as input and returns a list that has all of the unique elements of s in the order that they first appear, but no repeats. For example, (no-repeats (list 5 4 5 4 2 2)) evaluates to (5 4 2).

Hints: To test if two numbers are equal, use the = procedure. To test if two numbers are not equal, use the not procedure in combination with =. You may find it helpful to use the filter-lst procedure.

(define (no-repeats s)
(if (null? s) s (cons (car s) (no-repeats (filter (lambda (x) (not (= (car s) x))) (cdr s)))))
)

Use Ok to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q no_repeats -u
python3 ok -q no_repeats

Q9: Substitute

Write a procedure substitute that takes three arguments: a list s, an old word, and a new word. It returns a list with the elements of s, but with every occurrence of old replaced by new, even within sub-lists.

Hint: The built-in pair? predicate returns True if its argument is a cons pair.

Hint: The = operator will only let you compare numbers, but using equal? or eq? will let you compare symbols as well as numbers. For more information, check out the Scheme Built-in Procedure Reference.

(define (substitute s old new)
(cond ((null? s) nil) ((pair? (car s)) (cons (substitute (car s) old new) (substitute (cdr s) old new))) ((equal? (car s) old) (cons new (substitute (cdr s) old new))) (else (cons (car s) (substitute (cdr s) old new))))
)

Use Ok to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q substitute -u
python3 ok -q substitute
:

Remember that we want to use equal? to compare symbols since = will only work for numbers!

If the input list is empty, there's nothing to substitute. That's a pretty straightforward base case. Otherwise, our list has at least one item.

We can break the rest of this problem into roughly two big cases:

Nested list here

This means that (car s) is a pair. In this case, we have to dig deeper and recurse on (car s) since there could be symbols to replace in there. We must recurse on (cdr s) as well to handle the rest of the list.

No nested list here

This is the case if (car s) is not a pair. Of course, there could still be nesting later on in the list, but we'll rely on our recursive call to handle that.

If (car s) matches old, we'll make sure to use new in its place. Otherwise, we'll use (car s) without replacing it. In both cases, we must recurse on the rest of the list.

Video walkthrough: https://youtu.be/LAr-_twxXao

Q10: Sub All

Write sub-all, which takes a list s, a list of old words, and a list of new words; the last two lists must be the same length. It returns a list with the elements of s, but with each word that occurs in the second argument replaced by the corresponding word of the third argument. You may use substitute in your solution. Assume that olds and news have no elements in common.

(define (sub-all s olds news)
(if (null? olds) s (sub-all (substitute s (car olds) (car news)) (cdr olds) (cdr news)))
)

Solving sub-all means just repeatedly doing the substitute operation we wrote earlier. If this were Python, we might iterate over the list of olds and news, calling substitute and saving the result for the next call. For example, it might look something like this:

def sub_all(s, olds, news):
    for o, n in zip(olds, news):
        s = substitute(s, o, n)
    return s

If that approach makes sense, then the only tricky part now is to translate that logic into Scheme. Since we don't have access to iteration, we have to reflect our progress in our recursive call to sub-all. This means shortening the list of olds and news, and most importantly, feeding the result of substitute into the next call.

Therefore, the base case is if we have nothing we want to replace in olds. Checking if news is empty would also be ok, since olds and news should be the same length.

What doesn't work, however, is checking if s is an empty list. While this won't make your solution wrong on its own, it's an insufficient base case. Remember that we're passing in s with elements replaced into the recursive call, which means it won't become any shorter.

Video walkthrough: https://youtu.be/avYPLlaBtj0

Use Ok to unlock and test your code:

python3 ok -q sub_all -u
python3 ok -q sub_all